We should leap over Notre Dame who lost, Penn State and Oregon who barely beat unranked teams.MIZ
The headline “We should leap over Notre Dame who lost, Penn State and Oregon who barely beat unranked teams. MIZ” reflects a call for Missouri (MIZ) to advance in college football rankings based on recent performances and results. This statement highlights the dissatisfaction with the current ranking system and argues for a reevaluation of team standings.
Notre Dame’s recent loss has become a focal point for this argument. The defeat has led to calls for Missouri to be elevated in the rankings, suggesting that the Irish’s slip should benefit teams that have demonstrated consistent performance. Additionally, Penn State and Oregon’s narrow victories over unranked opponents are being scrutinized. The close calls against less competitive teams have been perceived as insufficient to maintain their current rankings, further fueling the push for Missouri’s advancement.
Missouri’s supporters are advocating for a ranking system that more accurately reflects the current form and achievements of teams. They argue that the rankings should be adjusted to reward teams that have shown strong performance and consistency, rather than those benefiting from previous successes or fortunate circumstances.
This debate underscores the often contentious nature of college football rankings, where team performances, historical successes, and individual game outcomes all play roles in determining standings. The call to “leap over” rivals is a reflection of a broader desire for a fairer and more dynamic ranking process, one that more accurately represents the current state of play.
Ultimately, how the rankings adjust will depend on various factors, including the performances of all teams involved and the criteria used by ranking bodies. For Missouri, making a compelling case through continued strong performances is crucial to achieving the desired ranking shift and gaining recognition on a broader scale.
