SAD NEWS: Two players from Tottenham Hotspur FC were arrested while suspended for beating their team announcer to death for just two reasons.

SAD NEWS: Two players from Tottenham Hotspur FC were arrested while suspended for beating their team announcer to death for just two reasons.

SAD NEWS: After beating their team announcer to death for just two reasons, two Tottenham Hotspur FC players were suspended and placed in jail.

Eric Dier has fully explained in writing the reasons for the four-game ban and the possibility of an appeal for why he leaped into the crowd during Tottenham Hotspur‘s FA Cup loss to Norwich.

After the FA Cup loss to Norwich on March 4, the 26-year-old leaped into the spectators at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, earning himself a long ban and a £40,000 fine.

The occurrence was decided upon after a four-month period, and the written justifications now contain all of the incident’s specifics.

“Eric Dier discovered he was being abused by a crowd after the last whistle. Nine distinct video recordings of the incident were given to us; three were supplied by the club and six were “ripped” from social media, according to the report.

“It is evident how the spectator behaved. It was undeniable that Eric Dier was the target of his abuse.”

The Spurs player’s younger brother, Patrick Dier, “grabbed the collar or hood of the spectator’s jacket” after the spectator began pointing and yelling derogatory remarks at Dier, according to the written explanation.

“At that moment, a second man approached Patrick Dier and the onlooker, perhaps attempting to push the first one away. Before the onlooker is released from the struggle, a fourth gets involved. Around this time, according to the report, Eric Dier leaped into the stand and started to move across rows of seats in their direction.

“Such proceedings would ordinarily have been subject to the Fast Track procedure, but in exercise of the chairman’s discretion (as Judicial Panel Chairman) under E: Fast Track Regulations, Regulation 3, those provisions were disapplied.”

Dier was questioned by the police but was not brought up on any charges for his actions.

The assertion that Dier was told the spectator had apologized for his behavior during his own interrogation under duress presented another problem for the panel and Dier. The police also said that he told them Dier’s actions during the incident had not made him feel intimidated. It was confirmed by the authorities that Dier, his brother, and the spectator would not face any more consequences.

In her witness statement, Ellen Peart, Dier’s criminal defense attorney, stated that she had been told by an officer that Dier would likely benefit greatly from the police decision document and the spectator’s statement in the proceedings, and that the decision to not pursue further charges against Dier was influenced by his lack of threatening behavior.